Fair Value Gaps represent one of the few repeatable patterns that consistently expose the imbalance driving institutional pricing.
The technical desk at Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital teaches that FVGs are less about prediction and more about understanding how algorithmic order books rebalance themselves.
Where Fair Value Gaps Come From
An FVG represents an inefficiency—an area where price moved too fast for opposing traders to fill orders.
The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs
This creates natural magnets: price will typically revisit these imbalances to test, mitigate, or confirm order flow.
The FVG Trading Model Used by Elite Traders
Look for Strong Institutional click here Moves
Displacement confirms that institutional activity caused the imbalance.
Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone
This is the region where price is likely to return.
Patience Creates Precision
Institutions use these pullbacks to reload positions at favorable pricing.
Bias Before Execution
Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital’s bias framework—weekly, daily, liquidity mapping—acts as the filter that upgrades an FVG from “possible” to “high-probability.”
5. Use FVGs as Targets
Just as price gravitates back to FVGs for entries, it also moves toward FVGs when they act as future magnets.
The Result?
Fair Value Gaps give traders a rare glimpse into algorithmic intent.
Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.
FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.